Informed Consent in Psychology Research

Verywell Mind content is rigorously reviewed by a team of qualified and experienced fact checkers. Fact checkers review articles for factual accuracy, relevance, and timeliness. We rely on the most current and reputable sources, which are cited in the text and listed at the bottom of each article. Content is fact checked after it has been edited and before publication. Learn more.

Informed consent is a voluntary agreement to participate in a study, experiment, intervention, or treatment. To give informed consent, participants must be aware of the nature of the procedure, the possible benefits, any available alternatives, and the potential risks.

Informed consent ensures that patients, clients, and research participants are aware of the important facts of research, including duration, purpose, and potential benefits and risks.

For informed consent to be considered valid, the participant must be physically or mentally able to decide to participate in research. A person's consent must be given voluntarily, without coercion.

At a Glance

Informed consent is an essential ethical consideration in psychology research. It allows participants to understand the purpose of a study and the procedures that will be involved. It also ensures that they recognize both the potential benefits and risks, and are able to make an informed decision based on that information.

History of Informed Consent

Several court cases involving medical procedures that were performed without a patient's permission set the groundwork for establishing informed consent as a concept for both medical treatment and research.

Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees

However, the term informed consent wasn't officially used in court documents until 1957 in the case Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees.

Martin Salgo underwent a procedure at a Stanford University medical center. The surgeon injected a contrast agent into Salgo's aorta, causing paralysis of his lower limbs. Salgo sued the medical center and the chief surgeon for not informing him before the surgery of the potential risks. The court ruled in Salgo's favor.

Salgo's was the first legal ruling that determined doctors must provide patients with information about the benefits and risks of procedures.

The Nuremberg Code

A trial in 1947 investigating Nazi war crimes further cemented the idea of informed consent. Nazis conducted experiments on people held in concentration camps without their consent. The people who underwent the tests were exposed to freezing cold temperatures or even wounded intentionally so that experimental treatments could be tested on them. Many died as a result.

After the trial, American judges created the Nuremberg Code, which contains 10 basic rules for conducting human experiments. The rules stated that a person needs "sufficient knowledge and comprehension" of what they are agreeing to as part of the research.

Sufficient knowledge includes, among other elements, how long the research will last, what its purpose is, the research methods, all hazards of research, and what the possible outcomes are.

Today, researchers and health professionals are still held to the standards established by the Nuremberg Code.

Informed Consent for Psychology Research

According to the American Psychological Association (APA), researchers must follow several steps to obtain informed consent from participants in psychology research:

• Purpose: Inform the participants about the purpose of the research, the anticipated duration of the study, and the procedures that will be used.
• Right to withdraw: Tell participants that they have the right to decline to participate in the study. They also must know that they can withdraw from the experiment at any time.
• Consequences of withdrawal: Inform participants of any possible consequences of declining or withdrawing from the study.
• Risks: Inform participants of any potential consequences of participating in the study. This includes any potential risks, adverse effects, or discomfort that may occur.
• Benefits: Tell participants about the potential benefits of the research.
• Limits on confidentiality: Researchers must also disclose any limitations on confidentiality, including situations where identifiable information might be shared with other parties.
• Participation incentives: Clearly identify any incentives for participation.
• Point of contact: Tell participants who they can contact if they have questions about the research or the rights of participants in the study.
  

How Researchers Obtain Informed Consent

In most instances, researchers use a prewritten form that outlines all of the required information on the study. Participants sign and date the form to confirm that they have read and understood the information.

Informed consent is not as simple as getting a participant to sign a piece of paper, however. Informed consent means giving a potential subject time to ask questions and consider whether or not they want to participate in a study. Someone knowledgeable about the research should be available to answer questions and conduct a consent interview.

The consent process may even continue after the research is underway. The participants should always be given opportunities to ask questions and withdraw from a study if they wish.

Is Informed Consent Always Necessary?

There are a few instances when psychologists may do without informed consent. Such cases include when there is a reasonable assumption that the research would not cause any distress or harm to participants. Another instance is when a study examines normal classroom curricula or educational practices, in which interfering with observation would negatively affect the study.

Studies that involve anonymous questionnaires or archival data do not usually require informed consent as long as the research presents no risk to the participants' financial standing, employability, or reputation.

Researchers must make sure participants' confidentiality is protected at all times.

Even in cases where informed consent is not needed, participants can still withdraw at any time.

Informed Consent in Psychotherapy

Informed consent is essential in research, but it is also an important part of psychotherapy practice. According to the Society for the Advancement of Psychotherapy, clients should be provided with enough information so they can make informed decisions about their treatment. This not only promotes autonomy, but also benefits the therapeutic alliance, which is essential for treatment outcomes.

Deception in Research

What about cases where deception may be an integral part of the study? In some instances, informing participants about the nature of the experiment might influence their behavior and therefore the results.

Deception should only take place if the use of such techniques is justified given what might be gained from performing the study. It is often the duty of an institutional review board (IRB) to determine if the use of deception is acceptable and to grant permission for such studies to take place.

If researchers do use deception as part of an experiment, ethical guidelines suggest that participants should be informed of the deception and the true nature of the experiment as soon as possible.

Once such deception has been revealed, participants should also be given the opportunity to withdraw their data if they so desire.

Types of Deception

There are two major types of deception that researchers may use: indirect and direct. Indirect deception may be considered more ethical than direct deception.

• Indirect deception: In studies that use indirect deception, participants know before the study takes place that they won't be given all of the facts until the end. They can choose to participate or not based on the information that they will be deceived in some way.
• Direct deception: Direct deception is when researchers lie or deceive participants intentionally without telling them. By deceiving participants, a researcher is infringing on a participant's autonomy, meaning a participant won't have the honest facts they need to decide whether or not they want to participate in the research.
  

Direct deception is linked with negative emotional states and the low self-esteem of participants.

Example of Research That Used Deception

In 1968, psychologists John Darley and Bibb Latané conducted an experiment on individuals to test what became known as the bystander effect. They put people in separate rooms and had them listen to an audio recording of an actor pretending to have a seizure. Participants were directly deceived because they believed this person had a seizure in real-time.

Darley and Latané were testing whether or not and under what conditions someone would intervene and try to get help for another person who they believed was experiencing a life-threatening situation.

This study has been considered unethical by some in the psychology community because participants in the study were put at risk of psychological harm by listening to what they believed, falsely, was a person having a seizure.

However, others argue that to attain the most accurate results possible, some level of deception in the researcher-participant relationship is required.

Potential Drawbacks of Deception

While some argue that there are benefits for the results of a study if participants aren't aware of all of the facts, research shows that withholding information can be damaging to a study as well.

Participants who are deceived may know they are being lied to and withhold this knowledge from researchers.

Participants' distrust or suspicion of the researchers can lead to skewed study results as well as a negative reputation of the researchers.

More Resources

There are plenty of organizations you can turn to for support as you learn more about obtaining informed consent. Check out the below resources for more information:

• American Psychological Association's Study Participants and Informed Consent: This article goes into further detail about the ethical obligations of researchers to obtain informed consent.
• Food and Drug Administration's Information Sheet on Informed Consent: This includes a digital download of how to draft an informed consent sheet of your own.

Takeaway

Understanding more about this process is essential, whether you are planning to conduct or participate in psychology research. Informed consent is an essential part of ethical research, which means it must be obtained voluntarily and fully inform the participant of anything they need to know before they decide to move forward as part of the research.

If you are concerned about this process when you take part in a study or experiment, understand that it helps protect your rights and well-being by ensuring that you are aware of any risks or benefits associated with taking part in the study.

Verywell Mind uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.

1. American Psychological Association. APA ethics code addresses when obtaining informed consent from research participants is necessary.
2. Amer AB. Informed consent in adult psychiatry. Oman Med J. 2013;28(4):228-231. doi:10.5001/omj.2013.67
3. Bazzano LA, Durant J, Brantley PR. A modern history of informed consent and the role of key information. Ochsner J. 2021;21(1):81-85. doi:10.31486/toj.19.0105
4. American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists.
5. British Psychological Society. Obtaining informed consent. In: Practice Guidelines. 2017. doi:10.53841/bpsrep.2017.inf115.8
6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Information sheet: Informed consent.
7. Society for the Advancement of Psychotherapy. Informed consent in clinical practice.
8. Oregon State University. Research involving deception.
9. Boynton MH, Portnoy DB, Johnson BT. Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research. IRB. 2013;35(2):7-13.

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd
Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

only the largest reaching yellow hole" width="400" height="250" />

• Meet Our Review Board
• About Us
• Editorial Process
• Diversity Pledge
• Privacy Policy
• In the News
• Advertise
• Terms of Service
• Careers
• Contact
• EU Privacy
• Crisis Support

Verywell Mind's content is for informational and educational purposes only. Our website is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

We Care About Your Privacy

We and our 100 partners store and/or access information on a device, such as unique IDs in cookies to process personal data. You may accept or manage your choices by clicking below, including your right to object where legitimate interest is used, or at any time in the privacy policy page. These choices will be signaled to our partners and will not affect browsing data.

We and our partners process data to provide:

Store and/or access information on a device. Use limited data to select advertising. Create profiles for personalised advertising. Use profiles to select personalised advertising. Create profiles to personalise content. Use profiles to select personalised content. Measure advertising performance. Measure content performance. Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources. Develop and improve services. Use limited data to select content. List of Partners (vendors)